Resources / ADC12 vs A380 vs A360 Aluminum Alloys

ADC12 vs A380 vs A360 Aluminum Alloys

A practical comparison of ADC12, A380 and A360 aluminum die casting alloys for housings, covers and structural components.

Aluminum alloy selection review Aluminum alloy selection review
Audience
Buyers and engineers
Focus
Practical decisions
Next
DFM review
Output
Actionable checklist
01 / Guide

Alloy overview

ADC12 is a widely used Al-Si-Cu alloy for general die casting. It offers a practical balance of castability, strength, machining behavior and cost, which is why it appears in many housings, covers and industrial components.

A380 is a common North American specification with good fluidity and pressure tightness. A360 is an Al-Si-Mg alloy often selected where corrosion behavior and pressure tightness are important.

  • ADC12: general-purpose aluminum die casting
  • A380: good fluidity and pressure tightness
  • A360: corrosion-conscious option
  • Confirm against the controlled specification
02 / Guide

Castability and surface detail

All three alloys fill thin sections well when the tool and process window are designed for the part. Differences appear in fluidity, hot cracking sensitivity and how easily the alloy reproduces fine detail and texture.

For small features and fine texture, the gate and venting design can matter as much as the alloy choice. Alloy selection should be reviewed together with the tooling concept.

  • All three support thin-wall filling
  • Detail reproduction also depends on tooling
  • Review gate and venting with the alloy
  • Prototype before locking the alloy
03 / Guide

Corrosion and finishing

A360 is often considered where moisture exposure or improved corrosion behavior matters. ADC12 and A380 are common choices where the environment is controlled and the finishing system provides the required protection.

Powder coating, painting, e-coating and other finishes can all be applied to aluminum die castings, but each has its own preparation and masking requirements that should be defined early.

  • A360 is the corrosion-conscious choice
  • Finishing can add protection to ADC12 and A380
  • Define preparation and masking early
  • Confirm with the end-use environment
04 / Guide

Selection guidance

Start from the function: pressure tightness, corrosion exposure, strength, machining, finishing and cost. The best alloy is the one that satisfies the function with the simplest reliable process.

The alloy page should never replace the customer specification. If the drawing or end market defines a material standard, that controlled requirement takes priority.

  • Start from the functional requirement
  • Compare total manufacturing cost
  • Respect the customer specification
  • Lock the alloy on the controlled drawing
Buyer questions

Questions to resolve before production.

These answers define the normal project path and the information needed for a useful quotation.

Provide the controlled 2D/3D drawing, material requirement, annual quantity, finishing requirement, critical dimensions, target market and delivery date.

An initial feasibility discussion is possible, but the quotation and tooling scope should be based on a controlled drawing revision.

Tolerance and inspection requirements are defined from the drawing, critical features, process capability and agreed datum strategy.

Ownership, storage, maintenance and transfer terms are defined in the quotation or supply agreement before the tooling project starts.

Related pages

Continue through the project path.

Use the internal links to connect the material, process, industry, product and RFQ pages around one project decision.

Send the drawing. Get the engineering questions first.

Include the material, annual quantity, finishing requirement, target market and delivery date. The review can start from STEP, IGS, DWG, DXF, PDF or ZIP files.

Start an RFQ
Upload drawing