Resources / Die Casting Leak Testing and Tightness

Die Casting Leak Testing and Tightness

How to specify and verify pressure tightness for die cast housings, including test methods, acceptance criteria and process controls.

Leak testing requirement review Leak testing requirement review
Audience
Buyers and engineers
Focus
Practical decisions
Next
DFM review
Output
Actionable checklist
01 / Guide

Defining the requirement

Pressure tightness should be defined as a measurable requirement: test medium, pressure, duration, allowed leak rate and the surfaces that must remain sealed.

A vague requirement such as leak free creates disagreement later. The equipment, fixture and acceptance threshold should be agreed before production.

  • Define medium, pressure and duration
  • State the allowed leak rate
  • Identify the sealed surfaces
  • Agree the fixture and method
02 / Guide

Test methods

Common methods include air decay, pressure decay, water immersion and helium testing. Each has different sensitivity, cost and cycle time.

The choice depends on the leak rate that matters to the application. A coarse air test may be enough for a weather cover but not for a fluid housing.

  • Air and pressure decay are common
  • Water immersion shows bubbles
  • Helium is used for fine leaks
  • Match sensitivity to the application
03 / Guide

Process controls for tightness

Tightness is controlled by the same variables that control porosity: gate and runner design, venting, cooling, shot profile and metal quality.

Machining can also create leaks by opening porosity near a sealing surface. Sealing faces should be planned with enough stock and a stable datum.

  • Gate, vent and cooling affect tightness
  • Shot profile controls fill and gas
  • Machining can open porosity
  • Plan sealing faces carefully
04 / Guide

Acceptance and records

The acceptance rule should say how many parts are tested, what happens to a failed part, and whether rework or re-test is allowed.

Test records should be traceable to the lot so a field issue can be investigated against the production data.

  • Define sampling and disposition
  • State rework and retest rules
  • Keep records by lot
  • Link records to production data
Buyer questions

Questions to resolve before production.

These answers define the normal project path and the information needed for a useful quotation.

Provide the controlled 2D/3D drawing, material requirement, annual quantity, finishing requirement, critical dimensions, target market and delivery date.

An initial feasibility discussion is possible, but the quotation and tooling scope should be based on a controlled drawing revision.

Tolerance and inspection requirements are defined from the drawing, critical features, process capability and agreed datum strategy.

Ownership, storage, maintenance and transfer terms are defined in the quotation or supply agreement before the tooling project starts.

Related pages

Continue through the project path.

Use the internal links to connect the material, process, industry, product and RFQ pages around one project decision.

Send the drawing. Get the engineering questions first.

Include the material, annual quantity, finishing requirement, target market and delivery date. The review can start from STEP, IGS, DWG, DXF, PDF or ZIP files.

Start an RFQ
Upload drawing